17:02:42 #startmeeting 17:02:42 Meeting started Mon Jun 27 17:02:42 2011 UTC. The chair is bmwiedemann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:02:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:03:05 As always, today's agenda is on http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Testing_meeting - with 2 topics so far 17:03:05 You can still add to the agenda on the wiki while the meeting is in progress 17:03:28 #topic MS2 experience 17:03:42 LWFinger: do you want to start? 17:04:47 Yes. 17:05:35 I first tried the KDE Live CD on a VB VM. 17:06:29 Everything worked at first, then the network died and had to switch from NetworkManager to ifup. 17:07:00 I then use the NET Install CD to upgrade an MS1 install on that VM. 17:08:06 The first problem was a warning that "YaST was unable to find the correct control file". Ignoring that seemed to be OK. 17:08:58 Next, I got an error "Cannot read license file". Ignoring that was also OK. 17:10:01 After that, update seemed to go OK, other than the "Installing Packages" progress bar did not advance. 17:10:42 In addition, there are references to "11.4" in the slide show that need to be changed to "12.1". 17:11:33 After reboot, I got lots of oops messages from kernel 2.6.39-2-desktop. 17:12:14 In 12.1 MS2, the KDE plasmoid NetworkManager applet does not work. 17:12:48 I was agle to get both wired and wireless networking working with ifup. 17:13:30 The whode KDE desktop then failed to respond to any clicks! I do not know why. 17:13:54 Next I installed from the KDE Live CD. That went better. 17:14:40 Again the NM applet fails, but switching to NetworkManager-Gnome (aka nm-applet) fixed that. 17:15:23 The KDE shutdown/restart/logoff process fails - Bug #702220. 17:15:43 I have not filed any other bugs yet. 17:15:48 Done. 17:17:01 I guess, we should file something about KDE NetworkManager 17:18:29 Yes, I agree. It should also be in the most-annoying list. 17:19:04 LWFinger: could you manage this? 17:19:22 I also plan to see file about the license file missing and the bad control file, at least. 17:19:28 Yes. 17:19:29 I did a quick search on bugzilla and it did not find such a NetworkManager bug 17:20:29 LWFinger: I did not see the license and control things on openQA, so they might just be when updating from MS1? 17:21:04 Good point. I'll start an install from NET CD to check that. 17:21:24 otherwise, yast logs will be good to have 17:22:36 The original ones are gone as I blew away the original installation, but it would be easy to duplicate. Nice thing about VMs. 17:23:50 I did follow the openQA results prior to MS2 and filed two instsys/yast/zypper bugs: 698284 700881 (both linked on openQA) 17:24:32 suspected to be caused by the major rpm upgrade 17:26:41 I still need to make a 11.4 reference image to include in automated dist-upgrade tests. And then I want to dist-upgrade one of my laptops soon. 17:26:54 done. 17:27:45 I did not see 698284 and I have3 not done any DVD testing. 17:29:04 tigerfoot (or anyone else): do you want to share MS2 experience? 17:30:55 then we should move towards the second topic... 17:31:40 OK. 17:31:55 #topic Request to rename MS6 to Beta 17:32:35 This one was mine, so I'll start. 17:33:25 I got no suggestions for changes to my original draft. Does that mean "it was super", or "noone read it"? 17:34:14 I read it and thought that it is OK... just the end was a bit apprupt. could use some nice conclusive sentence. 17:35:24 Do you have a specific wording change? 17:36:42 * cartman tries to catchup with the log 17:36:51 e.g. add "Thanks for considering this proposal to further enhance the user experience." 17:37:24 The test is available at http://ietherpad.com/DLUpjHL2jI. 17:38:54 Very good idea. 17:40:07 looks good. 17:40:12 I added a little more so that it reads "Thanks for considering this proposal to further enhance the user experience and the quality of the final 12.1 release.". OK? 17:41:46 I've forgotten where this should be sent. 17:42:30 opensuse-project ML would be good 17:43:09 One other question: Should it come from the Testing Core Team, the Team with individual names, or just names? 17:46:11 good question. I'd favour the second variant as we hardly ever get a majority of the Team members in IRC meetings or writing on the testing ML 17:47:55 OK. The whole team, or just the ones that show up for these meetings? 17:49:01 Holgi: Is the list of members of the TCT up to date? 17:50:30 hmm... we could just have a list of names of people who said, that they support this proposal. e.g. "Larry Finger, Bernhard M. Wiedemann, ... support this proposal" 17:51:24 or "of the Testing Core Team, Larry ... support" 17:52:36 That sounds better. I also heard from r.seete@gmail.com. 17:53:09 cartman: I don't know your other name. Are you a member of the TCT? 17:53:22 LWFinger: I am a bystander 17:53:28 OK. 17:53:29 sorry! 17:53:35 No problem. 17:53:52 I might be the guy fixing KDE bugs though, :) 17:54:09 we want anyone be able to support our proposal, though :) 17:54:18 In that case, anything I can do? 17:54:35 nope, I'll go over the reported bugs 17:54:42 and see what we can do for M3 17:54:45 and 12.1 in the end 17:55:00 cartman: great 17:55:27 bmwiedemann: TC Team is great :) 17:55:45 Indeed - I really want KDE to be good. I have one machine that must use Gnome, and I much prefer KDE. 17:56:19 Gnome is good enough for 12.1, for KDE the worst offender is NetworkManager 17:56:22 we'll see :( 17:56:44 LWFinger: if I remember right you are part of linux-wireless team right? 17:57:03 cartman: Yes. 17:57:17 nice :) 17:57:45 ok sorry for distruption, please resume 17:57:54 My parts are the RealTek and Broadcom drivers. 17:59:00 one of you guys should learn C++ and fix Plasma Network Applet for once and all =) 17:59:48 I think we are done with this topic. The content of the E-mail and the recipient are clear. Should I send it, or have one other cycle of review? 18:00:16 cartman: Shh, but I do know C++. I just dont like it. 18:00:36 we could ask for more people here to support it. 18:01:28 OK. I'll send a revised version to the testing ML and ask anyone that supports it to let me know. 18:01:41 Holgi, a-865, anaumov, cartman, CzP, [daemon], EGD, [jmp], Jonathan_R, tigerfoot, zaitor : do you support the rename of MS6 to Beta as detailled in http://ietherpad.com/DLUpjHL2jI ? 18:02:29 I support the proposal. 18:04:58 I guess, email to testing ML will be better to give people time to read. 18:05:42 but we should give it some deadline - e.g. in 7 days 18:06:36 bmwiedemann: I don't mind 18:06:42 cartman: What is your real-world name? 18:06:48 #topic open discussion 18:07:21 LWFinger: about the list of TCT, I just know that one person resigned official 18:07:38 LWFinger: about the others, I have no information 18:07:58 I also wanted to mention that http://connect.opensuse.org has a Testers group (currently on bottom of page 2 of groups) that you can join 18:08:36 LWFinger: "Ismail Donmez" 18:11:59 Holgi: Thanks. I think I'll go with the names that respond to the next E-mail. 18:12:13 LWFinger: ok 18:13:01 and then we should schedule our next IRC meeting - e.g. 2011-07-18 17:00 UTC would be the Monday shortly after MS3 release 18:14:02 sounds a reasonabkle 18:14:08 sounds a reasonable date 18:15:08 OK with me. 18:15:36 http://ietherpad.com/DLUpjHL2jI won't open 18:16:21 server appears to be down atm 18:16:36 It is down from here as well. 18:17:23 I'll check it in an hour, or so. 18:18:03 LWFinger: did you send the email yet? 18:18:27 Not yet. 18:18:48 cool I just subscribed :) 18:19:01 Good. 18:19:25 do we have any more testing-topics to discuss? 18:20:27 Then I will close today's meeting. Thanks everyone for attending. I will add links to the logs on http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Testing_meeting 18:20:30 #endmeeting