17:01:05 #startmeeting openSUSE Project Meeting 17:01:05 Meeting started Wed Nov 14 17:01:05 2012 UTC. The chair is vuntz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:01:20 here we go! 17:01:28 so, who do we have for the meeting? 17:01:31 * vuntz looks left and right 17:01:39 I'm here today. :) 17:01:56 half of me 17:02:00 * lnussel is here 17:02:11 tigerfoot: where's the other half? :-) 17:03:07 so, here's the agenda we have on the wiki right now: 17:03:07 Update on inactive mailing lists (see bug) 17:03:08 Update on GCI (Google Code-In) (Manu) 17:03:08 Update on admin@o.o reactiveness (Vincent) 17:03:08 Status of Board elections (Vincent) 17:03:10 Next meeting chair (current chair) 17:03:36 if there's any topic people want to add, no problem, we'll have the topic after those ones 17:03:55 and of course, there's Q&A at the end 17:04:13 so first topic 17:04:19 #topic Update on inactive mailing lists 17:04:56 so we had a bug to track this: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785517 17:05:01 openSUSE bug 785517 in openSUSE.org (Infrastructure) "Closing down of Inactive Mailing Lists" [Enhancement,Resolved: upstream] 17:05:10 vuntz: sorry migrating postgresql Gigabyte server with new packages ... which part (right or left) did you prefer here ;-) 17:05:18 but it was closed because the admin team is already tracking this 17:05:31 afaik, it's not done yet 17:06:00 henne told me at the conference it's the usual ENOTIME 17:06:01 don't have any more update on this, I guess manu might know more (but he's sleeping) 17:06:11 (see also http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2012-11/msg00033.html ) 17:06:26 #info not done yet, mostly due to lack of time 17:07:04 cboltz: do you know if henne is the one who will handle that at some point? 17:07:29 in theory yes - he's the ML admin on many (all?) lists 17:07:41 in practise, I don't know if/when he has time 17:08:00 I also don't know who else has access to lists.o.o 17:08:07 #info henne will likely be the one dealing with this 17:08:46 vuntz a todo, create a backup ML admin no? 17:09:15 one people that Henne can instruct ... 17:09:32 tigerfoot: let me move to the "Update on admin@o.o reactiveness" topic so we can discuss this :-) 17:09:39 #topic Update on admin@o.o reactiveness 17:10:05 #info suggestion to create a backup admin for mailing list, so that previous topic can be dealt with faster 17:10:36 #info some discussion about admin@ was summarized by christian: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2012-11/msg00033.html 17:10:48 tigerfoot: it's not a bad idea, indeed 17:11:02 we might need to know who's doing what in admin@ first (there might already be a backup?) 17:12:11 do we have a list of the *.opensuse.org infrastructure? 17:12:11 darix: is there some documentation of who is doing what on admin@? (and if no, do you think it's reasonable to ask for such a list, so people can know where to step up?) 17:12:27 * vuntz is only aware of http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Services_team 17:12:43 cboltz: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Services_help ? 17:13:26 (darix is in another meeting at the same time, so might be slow to answer) 17:13:41 indeed, Services_help looks good 17:13:59 vuntz: which items are handled slow mainly for people? 17:15:20 darix: I've heard about additions to planet.o.o and mailing list-related things, but maybe those were exceptional cases -- can't tell 17:15:56 vuntz: well planet was slow because pascal stepped down and i didnt jump up fast enough. 17:16:02 i might have someone to help me with that. 17:16:16 that's great news! 17:16:20 for ml it is similar ... henne is officially assigned 17:16:31 but not sure we can easily give access to this 17:17:18 #info someone might step up soon to help with planet.o.o administration 17:17:54 more precisely from darix words, someone internal of SUSE no? 17:18:11 tigerfoot: well for planet it will be a community member 17:18:27 oh okay .. cool 17:18:41 #info helping with ML might be possible only from SUSE people at the moment (due to access restrictions) 17:19:00 tigerfoot, cboltz: have you heard of any other issues with admin@ reactiveness? 17:20:15 and do you feel we should try to find a SUSE guy to help henne with ML maintenance? 17:20:16 IIRC not - except wiki update, but that's not directly related to admin@ 17:21:05 for the MLs - merging and closing some of the MLs was decided at least a year ago IIRC - does that answer the question? ;-) 17:21:13 vuntz: not recently for admin ( and well the infrastructure is going right the last weeks) 17:21:21 cboltz: heh, fair enough :-) 17:21:23 cboltz: i can try to poke henne about it 17:21:51 darix beware of the bear 17:22:09 tigerfoot: i got a weight advantage 17:22:33 darix: you'll have to change the importance of the MLs on his TODO list - not sure how to manage that ;-) 17:22:48 darix: can you also ask henne if he's okay having someone helping him with ML? 17:25:04 vuntz: yes 17:25:20 darix: sweet, thanks! 17:25:25 #action darix to ask henne about getting someone else to help with administrating the mailing lists 17:25:32 anything else on this topic? 17:25:54 maybe the status of the wiki update 17:26:04 in case someone knows more than I know ;-) 17:26:39 cboltz: maybe tell us what you know, and then we'll see if someone knows more :-) 17:27:15 I know that Scott had 1.19 in git, but it didn't work for some reason 17:27:32 now git (and enstage.o.o) is back to 1.17 17:27:45 and I can't find 1.19 in git anymore 17:28:08 cboltz: we need to ask scott, he was the only one involved 17:28:37 I was afraid of this answer ;-) 17:28:39 cboltz: what's the git repo url? 17:29:06 https://github.com/openSUSE/wiki 17:29:22 digitltom: thanks! 17:29:43 cboltz: isn't this a 1.19 branch: https://github.com/openSUSE/wiki/tree/mw_upgrade_1.19 17:30:02 yes, but the files in it are from 1.17 17:30:09 (check for example the release notes) 17:30:39 hrm, weird 17:30:50 I guess someone force-pushed an old revision 17:31:08 it looks like that 17:32:02 #info status of wiki update: an attempt to update to 1.19 was in git, but it didn't work, so everything went back to 1.17. The git branch (repo: https://github.com/openSUSE/wiki) also got force-pushed :/ 17:32:27 cboltz: did you try to talk to scott about this? 17:32:46 ENOTIMEYET, sorry 17:33:01 cboltz: no worry :-) 17:33:14 but I promise to do it before the mailinglist cleanup is done ;-) 17:33:18 heh 17:33:21 works for me 17:33:31 #action cboltz to ask scott about status of wiki update 17:33:39 ok 17:33:46 anything else on infrastructure? 17:34:31 * vuntz takes this as a no 17:34:33 next topic! 17:34:36 #topic Update on GCI (Google Code-In) 17:34:52 manu is not here, but he gave me an update on this earlier today 17:35:00 so we didn't make it 17:35:33 the selected organizations can be found at: http://google-opensource.blogspot.fr/2012/11/mentoring-organizations-for-google-code.html 17:36:03 there's a good reason we didn't make it, though: we didn't have any ideas in our list of ideas, so there was no real point in applying :/ 17:36:52 my guess is that we failed at pushing people to think about ideas to put on the list 17:37:08 and we might not have had someone with enough time to do that push 17:37:12 (manu was busy, for instance) 17:37:32 so something we should get better at for next year... 17:37:51 #info we're not participating this year 17:38:03 #info list of selected organizations: http://google-opensource.blogspot.fr/2012/11/mentoring-organizations-for-google-code.html 17:38:27 #info we did a bad job at creating a list of ideas for students since we didn't have any ideas :/ 17:38:40 any question/comment on this topic? 17:39:36 hmm 17:39:41 no osc gsoc next year? 17:39:45 (it's worth pointing out that selected orgs don't have hundreds of tasks listed; so we could have done that) 17:39:46 <}ls{> is there still a chance to get on this list? 17:40:13 darix: no, that's just code-in; I don't think it will have any specific influence on our participation for GSoC next year 17:40:15 Shouldn't we ( we has people knowing how GCI works) educate, and publish more in advance topis on news, and drive/mentor futur mentoring candidate ? 17:40:25 ah 17:40:25 }ls{: as far as I know, no, not for this year 17:41:02 and yes clarify GCI versus GSOC 17:41:14 tigerfoot: I guess we should, yes... 17:41:15 sure 17:41:40 so both GCI and GSoC are programs sponsored by Google to get students to contribute to free software projects 17:41:57 GCI is targetted at high-school students, and is about short/easy tasks 17:42:05 there's no more money involved 17:42:13 vuntz: maybe we should just decide not to participate in gci, when we don't have the manpower to do a proper application 17:42:20 GSoC is for university students, and last 3-4 months 17:42:23 * tigerfoot don't have money, and did we have easy tasks :-) 17:43:15 digitltom: well, we thought we'd have manpower as we had people stepping up to do the admin work. But without mentor manpower, indeed... 17:44:50 my feeling is that we didn't try that much to get people to be mentors, so we don't even know if people didn't want that or not 17:45:47 #info next time, we will need to evaluate if there's interest for mentoring students in GCI, so we can know if it's worth applying 17:46:20 okay, moving on to next topic, I guess 17:46:33 #topic Status of Board elections 17:46:41 digitltom: do you want to say a few words on this? 17:48:22 we already have 2 candidates 17:49:00 we have the page: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board_election 17:49:13 vuntz: got to run 17:49:14 later 17:49:43 so please tell us if you want to apply, or want to nominate a candidate until 27.11. 17:49:49 #info elections fully documented at http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board_election 17:49:56 #info already two candidates 17:50:01 Ballots will open on 5.12. 17:50:25 #info people can apply to run, or nominate a candidate until November 27th 17:50:31 darix: thanks! 17:52:20 as digitltom mention, we can nominate people. So don't hesitate to nominate people you'd like to see on the board! 17:52:34 (or don't hesitate to run! :-)) 17:52:45 please send nominations to election-officials@opensuse.org 17:52:46 any comment/question? 17:52:49 nominations have a sad history :) 17:52:49 digitltom: you said 2 candidates but only one is visible on the wiki page 17:53:22 nmarques: we don't get busy with past things, only bright future has our attention :-) 17:53:44 tigerfoot, "those who can not remember the past are condemned to repeat it" - Alexander Dumas 17:55:02 tigerfoot: second candidate is tittiatcoke (he sent a mail to opensuse-project); I guess wiki page didn't get updated so far :-) 17:56:49 vuntz: cool 17:57:12 nmarques: those who look at the past, forget the present, and have no idea for the future ... (me) 17:57:20 :-) 17:57:31 ok, let's move on to next topic? 17:58:00 #topic Next meeting chair 17:58:26 I'm not 100% sure I can attend the next meeting 17:58:54 so it'd be nice to have someone step up to chair it in case I can't make it :-) 17:59:25 * vuntz looks at hendersj ;-) 18:00:01 (I can see if some board member can be there, but afaik, the current time is not too good for most of them) 18:00:17 :) 18:00:37 I'd be happy to if my schedule allows and if I know what I need to do to get the ball rolling. :) 18:01:00 I do, however, have a meeting next time around that overlaps by 30 minutes. 18:01:12 ah, not perfect then 18:01:33 If the current time isn't good for the board, though, maybe we should evaluate a time that is better? 18:01:39 okay, I'll see if I can find someone in case I'll be busy 18:02:46 hendersj: well, there's generally no good time that work for most people; my understanding was that this time works okay-ish for other people who want to join the meetings 18:02:51 vuntz: a small post on -project ml with the different steps or a link to wiki page, how to stand up and act correctly ... 18:03:12 http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Meetings has some info on how to use bugbot 18:03:23 and that's really what most people need to know 18:03:33 I can write down some more stuff, though 18:03:48 #action vuntz to find a replacement chair in case he can't make it for next meeting 18:04:02 #action vuntz to write some short doc on what chairing involves, and how to do it 18:04:08 vuntz: I don't think this is a "technical" problem ;-) 18:04:27 vuntz: That URL is interesting but it looks like op privs are needed to use bugbot (unless I'm reading that wrong)? 18:04:27 IMHO the problem is that the chair should know something about the topics of the meeting 18:04:37 or at least know who knows it ;-) 18:04:56 hendersj: yeah, we can give you that 18:04:58 cboltz: Yes, that's what happened last time - I'd have happily started it if I'd known it was OK to do so (now I know), but I had no idea about any of the topics. 18:05:19 vuntz: OK - that sounds good. :) 18:05:24 maybe contact the people who proposed the ideas about the agenda and explain better what they mean by it 18:05:29 cboltz: all topics should have a name associated to them, so we know who shall lead them (imho) 18:05:46 That would be a good idea - always good to know whose item an agenda item is. :) 18:05:57 hendersj, true! 18:06:09 "If you add things to the agenda make sure to leave your name" (from the agenda page) 18:06:28 :-) 18:06:34 we're already overtime 18:06:38 let's quickly move to Q&A 18:06:42 #topic Q&A 18:07:55 any question? 18:08:14 Not from me. 18:09:31 ok, no question :-) 18:09:38 #info no question! 18:09:38 Actually....speaking of op privs on IRC, I remember now thinking that maybe it would be useful if we had that for the forum admins for the forums channel. 18:09:42 did you consider my idea of hiring a designer from suse to help the project? 18:10:16 * cboltz recomments a #undo 18:10:23 #undo 18:10:23 Removing item from minutes: 18:10:30 (or selected staff, I know malcolmlewis is around on IRC on occasion) 18:10:31 cboltz: thanks, that's what I was looking for ;-) 18:10:47 * malcolmlewis hides 18:10:53 hendersj: the forum channel is #opensuse-forum? 18:11:07 #opensuse-forums 18:11:53 I have absolutely no idea how to do that :-) 18:12:02 hendersj: I recommend you talk to darix about that 18:12:17 OK, will do - just e-mail admin@o.o? 18:12:44 #info hendersj asking about handling op privs on #opensuse-forums; nobody present knows, but darix or admin@ should know 18:13:00 hendersj: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Services_help#irc_channels 18:13:15 #undo 18:13:15 Removing item from minutes: 18:13:18 Perfect, thanks - will follow up offline. :) 18:13:31 #info hendersj asking about handling op privs on #opensuse-forums; nobody present knows, but darix or ircops@o.o should know 18:13:54 anditosan: re your question 18:14:14 has the board thoght about the idea of having a paid designer for the project? 18:14:21 I have not received word from Benito 18:14:40 the board itself didn't discuss that 18:14:44 right 18:14:46 toscalix 18:14:55 * tigerfoot oups sorry 18:15:16 and this is indeed something that, I feel, would feel in toscalix' hands 18:15:23 but I can chat with him about this if you want? 18:15:27 vuntz, could you bring the up the question to SUSE? I don't seem to get an answer 18:16:25 I know that right now kwwii and a another designer are the desgin team but an extra person would be ideal if SUSE thought this was worthwhile 18:16:28 #info anditosan raises the topic of having a paid designer (from SUSE) to work on openSUSE; vuntz will chat with toscalix to see if there's a possibility for this 18:16:43 #action vuntz to talk to toscalix about a paid designer for openSUSE 18:16:47 thank you 18:17:08 that's all for me 18:17:33 if there's nothing else, I suggest we close the meeting since we're nearly 20 minutes late :-) 18:17:49 1 18:17:51 2 18:17:55 3 18:17:58 ok, we're done :-) 18:18:00 thanks all! 18:18:00 vuntz: you'll have to wait 3 minutes - we are only 17 minutes late ;-) 18:18:04 thx 18:18:06 #endmeeting