18:01:47 #startmeeting openSUSE Project+Board Meeting 2-Nov-2011 18:01:47 Meeting started Wed Nov 2 18:01:47 2011 UTC. The chair is AlanClark. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:01:47 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 18:02:23 #chair henne AlanClark prusnak mrdocs suseROCKS 18:02:23 Current chairs: AlanClark henne mrdocs prusnak suseROCKS 18:03:02 I don't believe Rupert will be joining us today 18:03:16 #meetingtopic openSUSE Project Meeting - http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Project_meeting 18:03:35 mrdocs: which # command did I miss? 18:03:59 #topic 18:04:03 AlanClark, When you do #startmeeting you should make it meaningful like @startmeeting Board+Project 11-02-2011 or something like that 18:04:26 then when you do #topic, it appends to the meeting name you designated in #startmeeting 18:05:14 suseROCKs: I did that.? 18:05:30 right 18:05:36 i missed that :-) 18:05:42 so you didn't miss anything. 18:05:56 Ok today's agenda includes: 18:06:09 1. Action items from prevous meetings 18:06:13 2. status reports 18:06:18 3. 2012 elections 18:06:27 4. permission requests 18:06:31 5. Improvements 18:06:34 6. Q/A 18:06:56 The details are located on http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Project_meeting 18:07:09 Anyone want to add to today's project meeting agenda? 18:07:39 #topic Action items from previous meetings 18:07:55 Can we discuss contributor gifts first? I have to leave in about 15 minutes... 18:08:56 sure. cboltz go ahead with an update. I've seen a lot of email, but am still catching. 18:09:08 s/catching/catching up 18:09:08 I'll paste the summary... 18:09:18 I sent a summary to the project ML about two weeks ago 18:09:20 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2011-10/msg00036.html 18:09:21 the (IMHO) most relevant replies were 18:09:23 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2011-10/msg00043.html 18:09:24 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2011-10/msg00041.html 18:09:26 I'll give a summary: 18:09:27 The most welcome gifts seem to be T-shirts (or polo shirts) 18:09:27 how come I don't see the contributor AI listed in the bugzila list? 18:09:29 Most people think that "at each release" would be the best "frequency" for a gift - probably because they are used to it 18:09:30 The idea for playing cards resulted in the idea to create an openSUSE game (as a separate project), but not as a contributor gift 18:09:32 Also the idea of naming a star for each contributor came up, but that only means paying a random company for some cute paperwork. 18:09:33 The idea of awards at the conference got mixed feedback 18:09:35 SLE* licenses (xx% off) were proposed as a general member benefit, but don't fit as a contributor gift 18:09:36 That's the summary - now discuss, decide and find a sponsor ;-) 18:09:41 oh wait I see it. never mind :-D 18:10:31 cboltz: I know that you talked to AJ about the cost of world wide shipping 18:10:47 will a t-shirt bankrupt us? 18:10:58 yes, that's why my last line includes "find a sponsor" ;-) 18:11:03 :-) 18:11:05 wasn't the cost of tshirts one of the early reasons why we started this discussion? 18:11:26 hmm a sponsor to pay for tshirt costs (incl. shipping?) 18:11:39 the problem is more located in the cost of shipment and customs and less in the costs for the tshirt if I understand AJ right 18:11:40 general question: how many people want such gifts? 18:11:50 (at least when it comes to the non-european countries) 18:11:59 cboltz: is correct. It's the cost of shipping 18:12:13 k-d-l: well, not too many people actively ask for it 18:12:30 but they are very happy if they receive something as a "thank you" 18:12:55 well... here's my perspective on tshirts. When I started in the community I longed for a tshirt beecause I didn't have one... Now.. a few years later, I literally have too many tshirts. 18:13:01 k-d-l: it's not about "want" I think, it's more about "you just get it if you contribute" 18:13:01 okay, maybe we should start a poll on connect first? Yeah. such thank yous are always nice, but at the same we have to find a sponsor. 18:13:13 And even been told by my GF, can't you wear something other than openSUSE? :-D 18:13:20 k-d-l: poll about what? 18:13:35 cboltz: what's your recommended next step? 18:13:35 about delivering such gifts. 18:13:36 suseROCKs: take a shirt with tux on it tomorrow *g* 18:14:01 AlanClark: first we should decide if/what we want to do 18:14:05 but the "how many" question is certainly valid. 18:14:21 then someone[tm] can calculate the costs 18:14:21 How many shirts are we looking to send out? 18:14:23 I honestly don't think that a "sponsor" is the way to go because the sponsor will expect their logo on the shirt as well. And then we have to go through all kinds of design considerations, etc. 18:14:25 and find out if it is possible 18:14:46 suseROCKs: the sponsor could even be SUSE 18:14:49 I would suggest to search a sponsor (what about SUSE?) and then create a budget first 18:14:57 AJ didn't promise anything, but also didn't say that it would be impossible 18:15:10 cboltz, well the sponsor right now is considered SUSE by default. And SUSE indicates its costly 18:16:03 k-d-l: that makes it difficult for us _and_ the sponsor because nobody knows how much money would be needed 18:16:13 here's my concern about the thread discussion so far. It doesn't make clear that there is a biting cost factor associated with tshirts. So people didn't really give "something other than a tshirt" enough thought. That's why we haven't seen many cool alternative suggestions. 18:16:17 anything we do is going to incur cost. Let's focus on what we really want to do, then we'll find a sponsor. 18:16:20 What are the proposed criteria to qualify for the gift? 18:17:11 yes, asking a sponsor "we need xxx � for yyy" (and risk to fail) is the way to go 18:17:13 robjo, You're a member. That's the only criteria we use so far 18:17:30 AlanClark: agreed, anything physical will have shipping cost 18:17:54 suseROCKs: works for me but then it should not be named a "contributor gift" 18:17:56 we should start revoking membership status for those who don't vote in the elections two times then 18:18:06 so we get rid of inactive members 18:18:12 robjo, But you don't become a member unless you're a contributor 18:18:13 I'm certain we have "inactive" members 18:18:21 although you can be a contributor without being a member. True 18:18:37 robjo: any "manual" selection of people would cause lots of work and is probably impossible 18:19:00 ok - we have 3 subtopics here. 1 - decide if/what we want to do 2 - determine a criteria 3- determine a sponsor. I recommend that we have cboltz focus on the 1, then let's tackle the others 18:19:00 cboltz: I agree, that's why I asked the question 18:19:03 What about the removal of board members for actions not becoming of the board? 18:19:07 prusnak: +1 18:19:09 We should list it as a benefit (thus encouraging more people to apply for membership) that you'll get gifts with each release cycle. 18:19:14 we already have a small additional requirement: enter or confirm your address in connect 18:19:21 I hope this filters out inactive members 18:19:36 AlanClark: +1 18:19:38 cboltz: good point 18:20:23 ok guys let's stay on task here so that we can keep the meeting on target. 18:20:30 So, I will repeat. Members of the board, how will you enforce that for members of the board? 18:20:35 AlanClark: the criteria was already decided some meetings ago (and is written to bugzilla) ;-) 18:21:15 You will not get away with what you did, so you better answer!!!!!! 18:21:21 cboltz: ok, good 18:21:48 Once again members of the board who do not listen, what will you do? 18:21:51 gmzysk: The board answers to membership, what's your problem? 18:22:11 gmzysk: please let us discuss the topic at hand.. its just being polite.... 18:22:25 we can take this up in Q&A afterwards 18:22:41 robjo: Recently two members of the board made a decison without consenting the rest of the board 18:22:57 back to th etshirts, andvantage is that they are pretty light and should be easy to ship, i.e. pretty cheap 18:22:57 So, how do we deal with that? 18:23:05 This is a seriuos issue 18:23:22 gmzysk: you are off topic 18:23:22 And o none of the members of the board have addressed it 18:23:30 gmzysk: maybe (I don't know the details), but it has nothing to do with contributor gifts ;-) 18:23:37 please discuss it later in Q&A 18:23:39 gmzysk: yes, but has nothing to do with the contributor gift, lets tsick to the topic at hand. 18:23:40 AlanClark: you are one of those people and you know it 18:24:01 AlanClark: And so do MANY others 18:24:16 gmzysk: later please 18:24:16 gmzysk later, okay? 18:24:31 gmzysk: please try to stay on topic and we will address your issues in Q&A section 18:24:38 cboltz: what would you like to propose to resolve the "determine if/what" 18:24:57 Bikeshedding again 18:25:04 the most welcome gift seem to be t-shirts (or polos if you want a better quality) 18:25:33 one of the reasons is that you can wear them at events etc. 18:25:33 cboltz: +1 18:25:47 and show off "I contribute to openSUSE" 18:25:56 +1 for polo shirts 18:26:02 if its doable 18:26:19 +1 for the shirts 18:26:21 +1 for polo shirts.. also if the design is given I can ask local charges too ( might be cheap for us ) 18:26:40 (which is different to the "normal" openSUSE t-shirts and the reason why I proposed to have something special from the beginning) 18:26:41 yeap and all give sizes 18:26:56 manugupt1: yes, local production could help saving costs 18:26:57 You know, tshirts can be shipped in little packaging like in tubes or vacuum squares. Might make it even cheaper to send out 18:27:16 okay, so is there anything else to discuss than just how to get a sponsor to make them? 18:27:25 suseROCKs: +1 18:27:27 we could also try to find someone who distributes them in a country to save shipment costs 18:28:00 cboltz: Locally it will take about 7 euro / tshirt with one or 2 colors and good quality I guess for like 30 tshits just for info in India 18:28:18 cboltz and others. Those are good ideas tha we can chase offline. 18:28:26 let's discuss logistics off-meeting. We at least have a consensus on what we want to send out. 18:28:28 that sounds much cheaper than the shipment costs (and customs) :-) 18:28:37 yep i think this discussion belongs to the mailing list 18:28:40 cboltz: did you want to poll or go with a polo shirt recommendation? 18:28:45 cboltz: yes, if we are OK with some delay, maybe we can stick shirts in people's suitcases when they travel to a given country 18:29:47 AlanClark: it looks like everyone here likes the idea, and a polo is better than a t-shirt 18:30:00 so: yes, I recommend a polo shirt 18:30:01 I only have one final suggestion on this topic. Insted of polling tshirts vs. polo, let's open up a design poll and whatever is the best design that will influence whether it is a tshirt or polo 18:30:30 When I did some quick search for oSC shirts I found companies that do shirts for around $6 18:30:53 suseROCKs: do you think there are designs that will only fit on a t-shirt _or_ a polo? 18:31:09 cboltz, yes 18:31:14 ok let's go with a shirt. Let's work the details outside of this meeing. cboltz would you setup a IRC or email thread so that we can work the details? 18:31:29 A polo is more "logo-type" whereas a tshirt is more "anything goes" :-) 18:31:39 I'll send a mail to the project mailinglist 18:32:10 one last question: do we stay with "once per release" (which is what most people seem to prefer)? 18:32:12 also please set up a wiki page where people can upload design proposals. 18:32:32 robjo: good idea 18:32:33 cboltz, +1 to per release 18:32:35 and we need a time line for submitting the proposals and final vote 18:32:40 I'd suggest breaking into several subtopics: 1. Shirt type (polo, t-shirt, ..) 2. design 3. how to distribute 4. sponsor(s) 18:33:00 5. timeline 18:33:18 AlanClark: good point - that makes several mails, but keeps the discussion readable ;-) 18:33:40 AlanClark: +1 18:34:01 #info cboltz to create email threads to determine details for contributor gifts: 18:34:03 several subtopics: 1. Shirt type (polo, t-shirt, ..) 2. design 3. how to distribute 4. sponsor(s) 18:34:04 [12:36] 5. timeline 18:34:13 ok that #info didn't work 18:35:26 #info cboltz to create email threads to determine details for contributor gifts including shirt type, design, distribution, sponsors, timeline 18:35:37 very good Thank cboltz! 18:35:46 cboltz anything more? 18:36:07 no, that's it for now 18:36:14 (and I finally have to leave ;-) 18:36:25 cboltz: thanks for the effort 18:36:42 ok, next AI 18:37:10 manu - any update on the google code in that we should discuss here? 18:37:18 AlanClark: Hi yes.. 18:37:45 First of all I must say thanks a lot to everyone in and out of meeting for making the list of tasks 18:38:07 Some tasks are suited to GCI while some are not,, if No one minds them I had like to edit them this weekend 18:38:34 vuntz: and prusnak are the admins again for GCi and results will be out by 9th Novemeber and yes we already submitted the applications 18:38:34 manugupt1: Please let students decide what is appropriate for them. 18:38:43 manugupt1: no editing, IMHO 18:39:17 robjo: Yes.. but the tasks vary from usually a few hours to days, but some are simply not 18:39:39 as they are from 13-17, however I will do anything with prior consent from the mentor who has added himself to the task 18:39:57 Since its a no from you I wont touch it robjo 18:40:06 btw wikipage is at http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:GCI , list of tasks is at http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:GCI_tasks 18:40:23 robjo, I don't think GCI works the same way as GSoC worked. This one we have to assign tasks rather than let students propose tasks. (esp. since these tasks are to be approved before the start of GCI) 18:41:22 Does that sound good to everyone? 18:41:29 +1 18:41:32 +1 manugupt1 18:41:33 suseROCKs: but if we assign, that would mean we have to have a "resume" from every student 18:41:38 +1 18:42:15 robjo, No we don't assign tasks to a specific person. We assign (Define) tasks. And students look at the list and grab what they can 18:42:28 or am I wrong, manugupt1? 18:43:03 I think the mentor has a choice in determining the student too 18:43:25 Because at the end mentor decides if the student has completed the task or not 18:43:57 well I guess that's something to be clarified on the mentor ML 18:44:05 the mentor can pick or not the student, also he can reject a student 18:44:14 during the task 18:44:49 robjo: did that answer your question? 18:44:52 that is what I asked and learned 18:45:18 any other questions for manugupt1? 18:45:33 spam: the Greek Fedora community will work for openSUSE tasks here in Greece ;-) 18:45:54 warlordfff: Good :) 18:46:09 yeap ;-) 18:46:14 warlordfff: get gentoo too :P 18:46:18 AlanClark: didn't really have a question, just pointed out that IMHO we should let students decide whether they feel capable of completing the task, rather than playing "god" and deciding for them what is suitable. 18:46:39 robjo: +1 18:46:40 robjo: ok. manugupt1: What more is needed from the community at this point? Do we have sufficient mentors? 18:47:27 AlanClark: We have a sizeable number of mentors but the more the better, and we lack code related tasks ( like bug triaging and code refactoring and other stuff ) so we need more of them 18:48:23 manugupt1: we have the cross links to "junior bugs" and I think we have "packaging" on the list, that ought to be sufficient 18:48:41 #info Everyone please look at the GCI task list and volunteer to mentor 18:48:45 as a distro our focus is on packaging, not necessarily coding 18:49:09 robjo: yes .. but there are bug fixes, bug triaging etc ec 18:49:12 Thanks manugupt1anything else to discuss on this topic? 18:49:25 I dont think so.. 18:49:27 yeah, Lets Rock them 18:49:30 ;-) 18:49:36 I would wait for the results now 18:49:51 as vuntz suggested 18:50:26 manugupt1: Thanks for your leadership on this. The list looks great. Hopefully we will get lots of students! 18:50:28 Lets see if we get accepted. 18:50:56 ok, let's move to the board AI's 18:51:18 The Board AI's: http://bit.ly/opensuse_board_ais 18:51:58 AlanClark: you're up ;) foundation? 18:52:12 yes - the first one is assigned to me. 18:52:18 Here's a quick update. 18:52:51 I am focused on the budget and finance area. 18:52:58 at the moment. 18:53:23 I've met with SUSE Accounting and General Ledger teams. 18:53:44 I'm in the queue to meet with The Tax and Finance teams. 18:54:28 The topic and question that I'm pursuing, is what/how we run a budget within the foundation and account for the funds. 18:54:41 I'm getting myself into all kinds of topics 18:54:58 And trouble too 18:55:06 including "the paypals" of the world. 18:55:20 AlanClark: still working on the list about what the community has to take over when we have the foundation, as discussed at oSC? 18:55:34 gmzysk: please 18:55:58 robjo: yes that's partly what started me down this path. 18:56:15 AlanClark: cool thanks 18:56:34 The tax and finance is going to take a couple more weeks. (They are working on the end of year books at the moment) 18:56:48 I'll give an update again in a couple weeks. 18:57:18 In the mean time, anyone want to help me on the budget side of things aka spreadsheet for similar? 18:57:35 any questions on this topic? 18:57:37 AlanClark: Other than the finance stuff is the "foundation creation process" moving forward again, it appeared stuck for a while? 18:58:17 Attachmate legal on board now? 18:58:38 robjo: the main "stuck" is my needing to figure this area out for legal and others 18:58:49 ok 18:59:10 It's more complicated than I originally thought. 18:59:25 it always is ;) 18:59:48 yup, I'm learning about PCI 18:59:58 PCI?? 19:00:32 The payment card industry. (think handling credit card information) 19:00:48 Ok.. I thought something else 19:01:01 any other questions on this topic? 19:01:24 next AI - prusnak any update 19:01:33 no updates 19:01:44 unfortunately 19:01:49 ok, let's move to the next agenda item 19:02:09 #topic status reports 19:02:42 manugupt1 gave us an update on GCI. 19:02:52 any other project related status reports? 19:04:20 ok, then let's move to the next agenda item 19:04:31 #topic 2012 elections 19:05:13 Would anyone from the election commitee like to provide an update? 19:05:55 I do have one question.... 19:06:14 in last meeting, we all emphasized it was important to discuss with membership team regarding the election schedule. 19:06:36 It's kind of moot now since the timeline is now publicly announced, but did the membership team ever get contacted? Board never received any confirmation of this. 19:08:35 suseROCKs: yes good question 19:09:11 suseROCKs: Perhaps we should follow up with the membership committee to see if/what help they will need given the election deadlines. 19:09:52 I just want to make sure they don't feel blindsided. That's what they felt in the last round. 19:10:16 yes I remember the discussion. 19:10:27 suseROCKs: That is a funny comment coming from you!!! 19:11:21 suseROCKs: yeap I sent an email and never got an answer 19:11:31 so we moved on further 19:11:47 warlordfff, you sent it to membership ML or? 19:12:01 I send it to the list that is on the wiki 19:12:06 as contact 19:12:06 ok 19:12:20 then its a fair decision warlordfff 19:12:27 I can find it and forward it to you if you like 19:12:29 and I support it :-) 19:12:41 ;-) 19:12:42 warlordfff: Thank you for extending that effort. 19:13:03 nah warlordfff We take your word :-) 19:13:20 thanks ;-) 19:13:56 anything else on this topic? 19:15:22 warlordfff: Tell the team they did a great job on the announcement email 19:15:30 ok, next topic 19:15:35 ok AlanClark 19:15:40 #topic permission requests 19:16:26 Permission requests need to be voted upon by the Board members. Members of the community are invited to provide insight and comments. 19:16:52 We have 2 permission requests on today's agenda 19:16:55 I saw a proposal for tunisian openSUSE website. I give +1 to that 19:17:24 The first is a request from the Tunisian Ambassadors for the creation of opensuse.tn 19:17:25 is not that legal? 19:17:57 they said they have a problem with the owner,am I right? 19:18:13 wasn´t that the guys in romania 19:18:16 ? 19:18:29 no, it was romania, the second one 19:18:40 maybe I am wrong, sorry 19:18:54 +1 for opensuse.tn 19:18:58 ok I am wrong 19:18:59 +1 too 19:19:06 +1 opensuse.tn 19:19:28 Do we have any of the Tunisian Ambassadors present? 19:20:04 Tunisia just had an 80% election turnout. Lets make sure they do 80+% for openSUSE elections too :-) 19:21:11 I would like to make the following proposal. 19:22:44 Actually I have a question to the board before I make a proposal 19:23:42 Actually my question isn't just to the board, but the members as well. 19:24:10 In the email, they stated that they would like to create the website with tutorials, articles, etc... 19:24:38 Would we prefer that they do that on opensuse.tn or have opensuse.tn redirect to opensuse.org? 19:25:39 would be nice to have it redirected to the tunisian instance of our wiki (do have that?) but ultimately there are other things they could be doing on that website as well that wouldn't necessarily be redirected 19:25:45 If they run opensuse.tn independently of .org then I am not in favor of this 19:26:12 why would opensuse.tn not be a redirect to .or with a parameter that shows localized pages? 19:26:50 robjo, I guess it depends on what they're doing. In general, I would encourage folks to redirect to a central place, yes 19:27:13 but I don't think we should "require" them, but rather offer them guidance. They may not realize the capabilities here. 19:27:19 maybe then don't want to have just wiki 19:27:33 exactly prusnak 19:27:44 but i agree about guidance thingie 19:28:03 let's not limit them, but advise them we could offer them wiki space 19:28:06 eg 19:28:07 but then we loose this at .org 19:28:15 tn.opensuse.org ? 19:28:23 Do we have some written guidence that we can point them to? 19:28:34 Maybe offer them a combination of both like have them redirected to wiki, but they can also like some article blog or something like that 19:28:49 if they add tutorials and whatever that is completely independent from .org we loose info. 19:28:57 AlanClark, I don't think we have a very well coordinated FAQ on this kind of stuff. (Could be wrong) It's something we should strive for though, yes 19:29:09 I can help them with that 19:29:14 Having this stuff at .org might inspire others to translate the tutorials etc. 19:29:30 maybe after the elctions I could also write some related documentation 19:29:31 robjo: exactly.. and as it will mostly likely be in Arabic, it could be interesting for other Arabic readers 19:29:45 robjo: you are still expecting they are trying to start a wiki 19:29:57 ah warlordfff: you could really be a great guide for them. 19:29:58 which might not be true 19:30:05 prusnak: no, I said tutorial 19:31:00 there's also the concern that as we proliferate openSUSE sites, we disstort the openSUSE message across the board 19:31:03 The audio portion of a video can be translated, or the video can be subtitled, whatever 19:31:23 AlanClark: I would be glad too, just tell them to get in touch with me 19:31:24 suseROCKs: +1 19:31:28 but that's something we should address in some kind of task force to look at the overall symptoms and solutions rather than trying to figure it out here in a trademark topic discussion 19:31:31 i think this is not for us to decide 19:31:51 just tell me they have a yes for registering a domain and they can consider redirecting it to tn.o.o 19:32:02 I can give them great reasons to stay on the wiki and not make an independent site 19:32:03 because that's what's the best from the project perspective 19:32:07 I think this requires more discussion prior to a "trademark" vote 19:32:58 the trademark vote had happened 19:33:12 robjo, Not really, we approve such domain requests in the past with the one caveat, you don't shed openSUSE in a negative light. We can't change the rules here for tunisia what we've already done for other countries 19:33:17 AlanClark and the others from the board tought me well on that 19:33:19 or not? 19:33:42 prusnak, we voted :-) 19:33:44 ah it was +1 from non-board member :-/ 19:33:57 to warlordfff's point. Novell, as the trademark owner, needs to purchase the domain. 19:34:15 suseROCKs: ok, was not aware of that 19:34:22 they can use it for re-direction 19:34:22 So here is my proposal for a board vote: 19:34:49 1. That Alan work with legal to have them purchase the rights to the domain for 2 years 19:35:10 if it can be acquired for a "reasonable" amount of $$ 19:35:57 umm I think that's going to befuddle things 19:36:04 i vote against that 19:36:12 why? 19:36:18 has this happened before eg novell buying the domain ? 19:36:26 First of all, if that's the case, then Novell should just make life easier and buy all openSUSE.xx's out there and be done with it. 19:36:27 because by the time they'll have opensuse.tn they will go somewhere else 19:36:44 and i disagree that novell needs to purchase the domain 19:37:06 Prusnak: +1 They don't by law have to 19:37:18 Second, we want to encourage people to spread the word of openSUSE gospel. If we add this layer of bureaucracy, then people won't feel as motivated to do some potentially creative things in their corner of the world 19:37:29 I agree with prusnak and suseROCKs 19:37:30 we can enforce the trademark if they do something bad on this site 19:37:35 Novell just needs to give them the rights to use the trademark, that is it 19:37:42 but please let's not overdo this 19:38:38 It seems to me that Novell is trying to heavy hand the community here with misleading information!!! 19:38:52 gmzysk: please hold your horses 19:39:11 prusnak: I am trying 19:39:24 I'm surprised by your responses. I was looking at it as an expense that the Amabassadors wouldn't have to cover. 19:40:00 A domain at 50 euro per year? 19:40:15 AlanClark: I have no objection to buying the domains, but im concerned about adding delay and bureaucracy 19:40:24 23 per 2 years 19:40:30 same here 19:40:43 warlordfff: even better ;-) 19:40:54 it's really easier to buy that themselves 19:40:58 Its actually an ambassador benefit warlordfff ;) 19:41:02 you can use it 19:41:03 from my view 19:41:22 But it should be done quickly imo.. 19:41:23 manugupt1: yeap 19:41:31 ok so that leaves the approval of the trademark usage. 19:41:45 I just don't think Novell buy the domain is within the spirit of the trademark guidelines we implemented 19:42:04 However... I think it is a nice gesture on Novell (or SUSE)'s part if they offer to reimburse your costs for purchasing a domain 19:42:14 it will be much quicker to purchase it themselves +1 suseROCKs 19:42:37 SUSE has actually the legal right so... 19:42:45 Reimbursement is a nice idea, once the site is functional for the ambassadors.. but thats a different topic I guess 19:43:13 manugupt1: especially because we're talking about a small amount and Novell doesn't like reimbursing amounts under 500 euro or so 19:43:17 local comunities can benefit alot by it 19:43:29 jospoortvliet: Ah.. I remember :) 19:43:33 :D 19:43:42 jospoortvliet, so we encourage them to dummy up the reimbursement form :-) 19:43:51 * manugupt1 wishes jospoortvliet makes a local account for the Indians 19:43:56 suseROCKs: you suggest fraud? tssss... 19:44:09 and i think we should replace Novell with SUSE in the sentences anyway, no? 19:44:11 hehe 19:44:12 with the approval of the trademark usage, do you want to propose anything additional? redirection, work with warlordfff, etc? 19:44:22 manugupt1: hehe it's why a foundation would be good. 19:44:31 I will be glad to help 19:44:38 +1 trademark and advise they work with warlordfff :) 19:44:40 and guide them 19:44:41 Guys I need to head out to an appointment. 19:44:44 Yes.. 19:44:51 and thanks to warlordfff for all his work 19:44:55 suseROCKs: bye! 19:44:59 mrdocs: +1 19:45:02 suseROCKs: we need to vote before you go 19:45:06 suggestion they work with the ambassador welcome team (ie warlordfff) makes perfect sense to me 19:45:26 AlanClark, Go for it, I'll stick around for votes 19:45:31 NO suseROCKs you need to stay!!! 19:45:32 we can actually build a local community there 19:46:10 suseROCKs needs to explain to the community his recent actions!!! 19:46:30 gmzysk: I know that you baiting people to get into a flaim fight. You have been asked by several participants to stop. As the moderator I'm telling you to stop or you will be banned 19:47:03 AlanClark: You have no right since you know what I am talking about!!!! 19:47:22 gmzysk: Please be polite 19:47:45 manugupt1: You will understand when you find out 19:48:03 bbi 3 19:48:05 gmzysk: We got it that you have issue, please wait and sty on topic or go away and shut up 19:48:26 Can we move on with the votes? 19:48:29 s/sty/stay/ 19:48:38 ok guys Here's the proposal: That the Board approve the request for the use of the trademark, and ask that they work with warlordfff to align the content with the rest of the project. 19:48:42 robjo: i got it 19:48:53 +1 Al_Cho 19:48:57 oops AlanClark 19:49:17 other board member votes? 19:49:24 +1 19:49:36 +1 19:49:51 mrdocs: your vote? 19:50:01 henne? 19:50:04 AlanClark: +1 for me as well 19:50:30 ok, motion carries. I will take the AI to write up the response to the request 19:50:46 Thanks suseROCKs for sticking around. 19:51:21 next topic - Romania 19:51:21 Any other votes needed? 19:51:31 yes thanks Bryen 19:51:35 suseROCKs: no other votes needed that I am aware of 19:51:51 ok thanks guys. Really need to catch this appointment with dr. Bye 19:52:04 we'll miss you suseROCKs :D 19:52:07 come back soon... 19:52:13 bye suseROCKs! 19:52:42 Romania. I sent this information over to legal to have them investigate. 19:53:35 When I looked at the site, there wasn't much there. 19:54:53 Did anyone see something more? It's not clear that they are creating much damage to openSUSE 19:55:51 What was the actual complaint? Let me grab my emails... 19:56:37 The only message on their site is ,"PRIVATE AREA DOMAIN GO AWAY!!! " 19:57:03 My recommendation is that we leave to legal. 19:57:16 i think so 19:57:54 any other comments on this topic? 19:58:31 ok, let's move to the next topic 19:58:37 #topic Improvements 19:58:55 robjo, you've been patiently waiting... want to give us and update 19:59:24 Basically focusing on the ML & IRC topics at the moment. 19:59:44 Received positive feedback to merging wiki & web lists 19:59:50 That would be the first step. 20:00:09 feed back for merging cloud and virtualization was mixed. 20:01:04 One topic that came up was the naming. People appear to prefer not to start the list name with opensuse as we have opensuse-SOMETHING@opensuse.org 20:01:34 robjo: with a mixed response, do have a next step? 20:01:45 We still need some kind of "hand to hand" combat for all lists and decide what could be merged and make more proposals 20:02:32 My proposal overall would be, evaluate what could/should be merged 20:02:56 then send a message to the effected lists with a proposal for merge and a new name. 20:03:17 set up a vote for those subscribed on the effected lists 20:03:22 sounds sensible to me 20:03:50 and does a majority win or does it need to be %100? 20:04:07 robjo: henne send already to a couploe of mailing lists an email and suggested the closing. 20:04:19 majority wins, there will always be someone who thinks we have to have an ML for every topic under the sun 20:04:30 See for example: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-wiki/2011-10/msg00002.html 20:04:35 robjo +1 20:04:44 Yes, that was the cloud and virt list, that's where we had mixed response 20:04:55 So, this is happening already and in most cases the people agreed. 20:05:49 oh cool he did the same for web and wiki, that's moving. Great. 20:05:53 thanks henne 20:06:04 robjo: He did it for many lists - I saw it on opensuse-amd64 as well. 20:06:12 robjo: And on opensuse-boosters 20:06:22 robjo: You better ask him directly. 20:06:40 perfect, then henne should really give an update of what he did, I love that he picked up the ball :D 20:06:42 I suggest to postpone discussion here until the next meeting with henne participating. 20:07:06 AJaeger: +1 20:07:14 great progress! 20:07:22 robjo: anything more to discuss? 20:07:23 I'll ask henne to update the wiki with all the lists that received a message 20:07:33 robjo: go for it! 20:08:24 AlanClark: No, I will work with henne to get his status on the wiki, once we have a good idea where we stand we can look at IRC and then pick another topic from oSC 20:08:50 where is Henne? 20:08:58 very good. Thank you for pursuing this. I think that it is really going to help 20:09:32 warlordfff: Not sure. There was a holiday yesterday... 20:09:40 oh ok 20:09:58 Any other improvement topics from the fate list that we wish to discuss today? 20:10:07 warlordfff: He's on vacation the whole week 20:10:40 robjo: thanks for all of this.. appreciated.. much needed housecleaning 20:11:05 let's move on with the agenda 20:11:15 #topic Questions and Answers 20:11:44 gmzysk: you're up 20:11:47 Thanks to everyone for hanging in for such a long meeting. Are there any additional questions? 20:11:49 Yep I got one: How come I have not received a public apology from the board? 20:11:57 For their actions 20:12:04 disrespect 20:12:13 and top-down decison making 20:12:23 without even consenting me 20:12:24 gmzysk: What did the board do first of all? 20:12:25 * tigerfoot thinks that's life outside fantasia land 20:12:37 tigerfoot: :) 20:12:39 gmzysk: I know that the board owes you a response to your previous email. You will receive one 20:12:52 on the mailing list where you posted your original email. 20:13:02 AlanClark: You owe the community an aplology 20:13:14 As does Bryen 20:13:36 You both made a decsion on behalf of the board without their consent 20:13:41 about me 20:13:49 So, an email is not enough 20:14:01 there was no decision 20:14:02 gmzysk: I won't be baited into an argument or flaim war with you. If you wish to make a request of the board you may do so 20:14:28 warlordfff: can you build a gizmo green cake with apologize (even if we don't know why) ? 20:14:30 I have written you several times with no response, so don't bikeshed 20:14:32 Currently the discussion is without context for many, if it concerns the community at large please provide context 20:14:55 AlanClark: You will not tell me anything 20:14:56 * tigerfoot ask but no more than 10 lines :D 20:15:20 The board needs to discuss action against those members of the board 20:15:20 robjo: Agreed 20:15:42 prusnak: You know what I am talking about 20:16:02 No one has contacted me to apologize or explain 20:16:14 Just igore it right 20:16:15 to everyone: the context is the creation of the community council, we as a board needed more time to polish the details 20:16:36 And to expolain why I was given a no to it 20:16:43 sadly gregory misinterpreted my email as an ack from the board 20:16:52 A decision was made 20:16:57 gmzysk: I have seen one email from you. And you are correct that it needs a response. You will receive one as a response to what you sent. 20:17:06 gmzysk: no no... we only decide here in public votes 20:17:17 ahem 20:17:36 You have several emails 20:17:40 that is true, in theory, and how it almost always happens 20:17:42 why having another instance of what we already have ... 20:17:44 but not as it happened in this case 20:17:52 then we screwed up even more, because we were not able to communicate anything 20:18:09 gmzysk: If you want a community council why would you not post this to the project list? 20:18:15 but there was never a decision (either saying no or saying yes) 20:18:22 gmzysk: Yes why not? 20:18:25 * tigerfoot at least can only agree for the Jedi Council, any other instance is void 20:18:38 gmzysk: note that I didn't say a decision was made. I just told you how the board felt, according to what Alan and Bryen told me. And I said I thought it would make sense to hold off doing this until you would have build up trust in the community. Right now, you're exploding and not acting very professionally, which I think doesn't build up that trust. 20:18:48 prusnak: yes there was I have an email stating that from Jos 20:19:11 gmzysk: frankly, i don't care about yours correspondence with jos 20:19:37 prusnak: sure, I get you but leaving me hanging? come on man? 20:19:45 all decisions of the board are made here, in the public 20:19:53 It has been 6 weeks since the first email 20:20:05 so what i am saying is the we screwed up that we were not able to respond sooner with a decision 20:20:12 robjo: gregory and myself wanted to set up such a CC. We asked the board if they thought it was a good idea and if they would support it. Alan and Bryen said they thought the board wouldn't be comfortable with it considering gregory being so new. So I mailed gregory proposing to hold off from doing it for now. 20:20:28 So then what do you wan to do about it then? 20:20:40 Make people wait more? 20:20:50 How do you propose to move forward? 20:20:59 jospoortvliet: Thanks for the context 20:21:05 np 20:21:24 * tigerfoot love patience is a virtue 20:21:27 i don't know 20:21:33 tigerfoot: +1 20:21:38 IMHO a community council would need to be voted on by membership, in which case I wonder what the difference to the board would be. 20:21:38 but i guess we have to wait until the decision is made 20:21:52 prusnak: When will that be made? A timeframe? 20:21:56 I guess the board already does that or does not it?? 20:22:04 * tigerfoot think it start to be cold outside, propose to post-pond until spring bbq parties 20:22:08 One of the actions of the board is to resolve conflicts 20:22:19 I think we have two decisions to make: Will we have a CC - and how should be on it? 20:22:20 gmzysk: You are chastising people for voicing their opinion, not a good way to get a welcome response to your requests. 20:22:33 s/how/who/ 20:22:39 manugupt1: the idea was to have a separate body for that, because you might want to resolve the conflicts inside of the board as well (for example) 20:22:44 robjo: no that's not the point 20:22:45 robjo: I think we could start such a thing, the way gregory and myself wanted to do it, it would have no power and people would be free to come to it (or not). But of course it would be nice if the community and esp the board would support it. When they said they probably wouldn't, yet, I proposed to hold off. 20:22:52 and also it might be a good idea to have trained professionals in CC 20:22:54 robjo: there has been no response from the board in 6 weeks 20:22:58 robjo: I am not. I am looking for an answer 20:23:03 prusnak: Well then who will decide confflictws within a CC, its a recursion 20:23:15 manugupt1: You;) 20:23:22 no it's not, board can decide about conflicts in CC 20:23:26 it just takes time :) 20:23:28 prusnak: thanks man, I am one of those 20:23:38 manugupt1: note that in the plan gregory and myself made for the CC would not give it any power. If there is a big problem, the board would decide, just like now 20:23:54 gmzysk: two things: 20:23:59 yes 20:24:12 jospoortvliet: fine, but this should be raised on the project list and not in a "private" e-mail to the board. 20:24:14 mrdocs: yes 20:24:18 jospoortvliet: I note that.. but my point is the board is left to do nothing then except handle requests as we do not have a founcation yet 20:24:28 jospoortvliet: so what the advantage ? compared to the board if finally the board has to decide ... 20:24:37 manugupt1: that's not really a good reason now, is it 20:24:38 one, unfortunate that you were given the impression we ok'd things 20:24:41 robjo: we were just seeing if we got support and asking for feedback. No need to start a big (bikeshed) discussion on -project for that... 20:25:01 tigerfoot: the board is mostly engineers. the CC would have people who are qualified to handle conflicts 20:25:08 +1 20:25:16 mrdocs: ok, but you guys never communicated anything else 20:25:20 everybody hang 1 please 20:25:20 or not from what I saw 20:25:28 hang on 20:25:38 yaloki: a separate cc is not worth it imho, we should trust the board to do the right thing, conflicts withing the board is something else, we have done it in the past too 20:25:39 jospoortvliet: OK, but then there is no reason to bitch moan and complain at the project meeting if responses are delayed 20:26:06 manugupt1: you don't have the whole context and argumentation 20:26:08 robjo: I admit that it is not exactly showing how to behave properly. 20:26:08 ok please everyone hang on a couple of mins for comments 20:26:21 mrdocs: I am listening. Your second point please 20:26:23 first let's get to the facts 20:26:28 one, unfortunate that you were given the impression we ok'd things 20:26:39 ok 20:26:50 Hello, I have an opensuse 10.4 machine and I am using clonezile to back up its hdd. When I use the backup hdd to another machines, sometime I am having problems to boot. What and how I can fix such problems? 20:26:55 that comes from your lack of knowledge of our project works.. no one's fault 20:26:57 !support @ oper4 20:26:57 oper4: General technical support is in #suse (/join #suse), please ask over there 20:27:27 mrdocs: Maybe, ok, but do not blame that on me please 20:27:38 gmzysk: no.. just bad luck 20:27:38 oper4: please use #opensuse for help questions, we are in a project meeting 20:27:50 mrdocs: the second is? 20:28:14 second part is given the confusion about what was happening and no formal proposal beyond some emails 20:28:31 confusion from board members not at Brainshare 20:28:44 Exactly 20:28:49 so in this case, we had nothing to really act on 20:28:50 so 20:29:08 that's one reason you have not had a quick response 20:29:10 and 20:29:44 as it is potentially a major change in the way the project, we need concrete details 20:30:05 and a broad discussion with the member ship in general about this 20:30:18 and to this day I have no real clear idea what is proposed 20:30:20 so 20:30:21 So, you think you will find conrete details without discussing it with me? 20:30:23 Or Jos and I for that matter? 20:30:30 apologies for the delay 20:30:45 So, where do we go from here? 20:30:54 How do we move forward? 20:31:16 gmzysk: but on the other hand accusing board members is not a good way to begin a relationship with the community 20:31:54 i know several of them personally.. I have a lot of respect for their integrity and honesty 20:31:58 Well, you can't say that how the board handled things is not way to start a good relationship either 20:32:18 So, in that respect we are both at fault 20:32:25 and the board members *are* elected.. we do have a certain level of trust by the membership 20:32:34 gmzysk: I'll differ with your statement 20:32:47 except for one th eappointed one 20:32:58 gmzysk: There's a huge difference - the board did not respond in time at all - you're pushing quite aggressively here. 20:32:58 AlanClark: How? 20:33:09 and we have a track record to back that up - even outside of opensuse 20:33:24 gmzysk: your comments and personal accusations are getting tiring 20:33:28 AJaeger: It has been 6 weeks and I pulled my end of the bargain 20:33:33 so anyone would like to add to the facts ? 20:33:39 not opinion 20:34:12 let me add something 20:34:20 robjo: please you do not know all the details 20:34:31 while there has been no official response, 2 board members told me at brainshare they felt that the board would probably not support this 20:34:43 gmzysk: your tone of voice has nothing to do with the details 20:35:04 because they felt that gmzysk is quite new and they felt not comfortable having him in such a sensitive position without knowing him or having the community know him 20:35:17 gmzysk: further you will find that there is great respect for those on the board within the community, you are not making any frieds here at the moment. 20:35:19 sorry I was away, thank you for the information 20:35:29 I relayed this back to gregory, suggesting we should wait doing the CC until gregory had been around for a while longer. 20:35:42 robjo: Please you do not know all the details, so do not attack 20:36:10 gmzysk: robjo we're attempting to givie the details but you two are interupting :D 20:36:25 and tbh i think the rest of the board which might have been supportive of this initiative in the beginning, won't support the proposal after the recent development 20:36:30 jospoortvliet: please go ahead 20:36:33 note that in my opinion the board doesn't HAVE to OK the CC but I am not comfortable doing it if the board thinks it is a bad idea. 20:37:17 prusnak: why is that? 20:37:18 after my email, gregory send the board a mail which, well, wasn't very constructive in my opinion... The board still has not replied 20:37:25 except for now, that is :D 20:37:43 I hope I gave a good overview, that's it mrdocs 20:37:50 jospoortvliet: thanks 20:37:59 It has been weeks also with no response: so no not very respectful either 20:38:22 gmzysk: no its a problem the board itself needs to address 20:38:24 but 20:39:04 gmzysk: there's people outside waiting during months for becoming a member ! 20:39:14 pushing agressively, naturally makes one want to back up and say "What is going on ?" 20:39:16 any idea why #opensuse is invite only? 20:39:18 tigerfoot: which isn't acceptable either .. 20:39:20 oper4: it isn't 20:39:24 oper4: /join #suse 20:39:25 oper4: use #suse 20:39:32 oh ok 20:39:35 tigerfoot: this has nothing to do with membership 20:39:39 tigerfoot: is that currently a problem ? 20:39:59 but it is not a board decision, whether or not there is a CC is a decision for membership and needs a discussion on -project the board can way in on that discussion 20:40:12 mrdocs: well I think you can see why I am angry 20:40:14 I am well aware that -project threads get out of hand at time 20:40:20 nope just want to say to stressed people to take a breath, go outside make a walk, and come back after 12.1 release, and elections 20:40:26 that all 20:40:34 however, that's where the discussion belongs 20:40:35 Exactly 20:40:37 gmzysk: I think tigerfoot wanted to point out that in openSUSE some things don't move as quickly as some people wish 20:40:38 tigerfoot: best thing said in the last half hour :) 20:41:07 let me add one thing, btw: after gregory and myself send the proposal to the board for comments, we only got one positive response from pavol. Afer otherwise silent, we decided to move forward and get things up and running. This was stonewalled at the administrative level (setting up a ML) without any explanation. So let me be clear: the frustration from gregory is understandable to say the least. 20:41:09 gmzysk: we *are* volunteers with family, job and other responsibilties 20:41:10 Ajaeger: that still does not mean that they cannot write an email saying we are working on it 20:41:40 I agree with jospoortvliet 20:41:49 gmzysk: I respect you man but you are over reacting on that man 20:41:54 one thing has to be said though: the way this was handled was terrible 20:41:55 jospoortvliet yaloki : Thanks for the support 20:41:58 to put it politely 20:42:07 an that shouldn't go out of sight either 20:42:10 s/an/and/ 20:42:12 jospoortvliet: As I understood the CC in the beginning I don't think that it needed board approval, but when someone starts asking for admistrative rights, then that raises questions to the board. 20:42:16 But why not on -project list thats a question?? 20:42:20 +1 yaloki 20:42:23 warlordfff: thanks man and I understand your angle 20:42:24 yaloki: no it has caused some reflection by board members 20:42:39 I sure hope so 20:42:50 I'm as guilty as the next to have way too many things to do 20:42:52 I have a question here, Can I ask 20:43:00 we do not need yet another ML 20:43:01 manugupt1: please go ahead 20:43:03 and it's not reasonable to expect a response within 1 or 2 days in every case 20:43:12 but emails have remained unanswered for many weeks 20:43:20 AlanClark: the admin rights were for a list, 1 ML 20:43:39 yaloki: Will you add to your campaign a "service-level-agreement" for emails? ;) 20:43:44 gmzysk: and all the admins information 20:43:46 The only question, is there are a fw people here and they feel it was done behind doors, and nothing on the project list so why not that 20:43:53 AJaeger: no, but decency is not asking for too much I think 20:44:02 manugupt1: because we simply wanted to know what the board thought about it, not what everybody else thought. If the board liked it, we had the support from ppl who have some good experience and we would decide to move forward with it. We don't have to ask anyone for permission anyway 20:44:06 AJaeger: and we both know why it happened that way 20:44:25 AlanClark: read the rest of the thread, I was not asking for details just who to contact 20:44:35 But isnt it a too big thing to let the board carry alone and not the members get involved 20:44:57 manugupt1: asking the board wasn't necessarily the end of the story 20:45:08 manugupt1: and, also, you don't need permission to start doing something 20:45:09 robjo: it should be a private, closed ml. but could also be gregory and myself just mailing to each other and people contacting us privately. We just thought a ML, with archives, would be a better, more transparent way to handle things. 20:45:25 it needs legitimacy and trust, which is why I agree that it is very useful that it has backing from the board 20:45:29 yaloki: Why was not the proposal public that was my question 20:45:37 manugupt1: it wasn't at that point 20:45:39 may I say something? 20:45:45 warlordfff: shoot :) 20:45:46 warlordfff: please 20:46:17 Thanks to the people that support me 20:46:29 in order to avoid anothe Gnokii situation we made something that one year ago brought the project to a similar situation 20:46:31 Rather than those that just want to make it all my fault 20:46:35 manugupt1: that is a question only gregory and me can answer. And it is simple: we did not want to bikeshed. We just wanted to JUST DO IT(tm). If people wouldn't like it they could vote with their feet. But before we would go ahead we wanted at least the thoughts of a few key people. Some we spoke to, the board we asked via their mail address. 20:46:43 If you guys just wanted to get some feedback then mail to the board is of course just fine, however, you cannot show up here and start demanding apologies for people voicing their opinion and not getting a response 20:46:58 I agree with robjo here 20:47:12 to me it sounded like a decision made by someone and forced upon 20:47:19 robjo: Several people have written the board asking that for me 20:47:25 manugupt1: not at all 20:47:49 manugupt1: robjo maybe gmzysk can't demand an answer from the board in reasonable time but isn't it - well, reasonable, to answer? 20:47:49 yaloki: I am still not clear what the council will do except for resolve conflicts 20:47:58 manugupt1: well, exactly that 20:48:00 So, HOW DO WE MOVE FORWARD???????????? 20:48:03 wtf, it exist thousand of maillist possibility to start over the internet ... 20:48:04 jospoortvliet: Yes the board should have answered 20:48:06 manugupt1: be a spot where people can poke for help 20:48:20 yaloki: What is the board for then? 20:48:32 manugupt1: a lot of other things, with the next board 20:48:42 start a private google group, and whatever you need to start, and start 20:48:47 jospoortvliet: yes it is reasonable to expect an answer, but demanding apologies is not the best way to get one IMHO 20:49:05 manugupt1: help with conflicts - not help on e.g. packaging ;) 20:49:07 prusnak mrdocs: What do you suggest to move forward? A decision please? 20:49:22 yaloki: AJaeger Well we should see once the roles of the new board is defined right 20:49:34 sorry guys we took a missundertsnding and made it something Great, it is not, it is a missunderstanding, at least from what I saw and know 20:49:37 manugupt1: let's not go there right now 20:49:39 * manugupt1 is not against it but does not see the point in the present 20:49:46 i think we (the board) should send an apology for not replying sooner and to recommend postponing the creation of CC until there is a better proposal 20:49:52 Here is how you move forward, if you want your answer from the board you wait for it. If you are interested in getting a CC started you take it to the -project list with a proposal what it will be and how it will work 20:50:09 * tigerfoot applaud the fail of creating a CC for conflict which auto-generate conflicts before it start :-) 20:50:13 a better proposal? What? 20:50:14 but that's just my $0.02, not an official board statement 20:50:20 just to be clear 20:50:38 you'll get a lot of responses in a short period of time. 20:50:53 gmzysk: i understand your frustration with this 20:50:55 but 20:51:02 let's do this: 20:51:03 prusnak: the board is guilty of far more than not writing back. The communication could not be worse, imho 20:51:06 tigerfoot: That's why I agree with prusnak we should not have a CC right now. 20:51:14 mrdocs: yes 20:51:22 I agree we should not have it now, maybe later 20:51:27 gmzysk: it's the exact reflect of yours ... sorry this one is too easy 20:51:37 gmzysk: i agree, and we are trying to change the way we communicate, but that's a separate issue than CC 20:51:55 robjo: yes they call that a bikeshed. I don't care much about the opinion of most of the ppl on -project, to be honest... 20:52:06 prusnak: exactly 20:52:07 AJaeger: Why, you agreed to it also? 20:52:19 gmzysk: why not 20:52:25 anyone can actually follow this conversation or is it just me that is confussed??? 20:52:30 jospoortvliet: well you should, as community manager, that's the community 20:52:39 tigerfoot: Why not what? 20:52:42 robjo: "as a community manager" ? 20:52:51 gmzysk: while I have an great deal of respect for AJaeger, he is not a board member 20:53:04 ok, let's not go there 20:53:09 gmzysk: follow your purpose ... you ask aj why he's agree, and so why not 20:53:10 let's not put everything on the table right now 20:53:20 jospoortvliet: if you want backdoor private dealings because its easier then we have a sad state of affairs 20:53:31 tigerfoot: ok 20:53:44 yaloki: +1 20:54:31 well we can't have it both ways 20:54:32 ok, we have several threads intermixed. Let's see if we can bring this to a proposal for going forward. 20:54:42 gmzysk: I don't think the proposed setup is a good idea anymore - seing the conversations today, if it creates so much discussion and agressiveness, then I don't want one at the moment. 20:54:43 say "just do it" and then say that people must ask for permission on -project 20:54:44 robjo: again it's not about decision making, greg and me can decide to do this, if -project (or the board) agrees or not. But to know if it's a good idea I want input from people I trust, not from $random_person_ranting_on_-project 20:54:48 but that's yet another topic 20:55:10 AJaeger: But this was bound to happen and if fixed will only get better 20:55:19 robjo: moreover, most of the hard working ppl in our community have unsubscribed from -project long ago due to the huge bikesheds there. I don't intend to start another one... 20:55:22 jospoortvliet: Yes, you can do whatever you want...... 20:55:40 gmzysk: Let's wait and I suggest you get to know openSUSE better - and we get to know you better... 20:56:00 I agree with AJaeger 20:56:02 jospoortvliet: yes community and democracy at work, it's not everyone's cup of tea 20:56:12 I also agree with AJaeger 20:56:12 AJaeger: I think that is not a solution after what has happend 20:56:16 I agree with robjo too 20:56:33 So can anyone draw up a summary 20:56:40 robjo: We have no democracy, we have a meritocacy 20:56:55 yeah I would love to see a summary ;-) 20:57:04 gmzysk: Not sure what you are after then, you just heard jos say that you can do whatever you want, so go ahead and see where it goes. 20:57:08 gmzysk: If that's not a solution, then let's not do it. I'm not confident with moving ahead as proposed at this moment. 20:57:32 robjo: in a meritocracy (we don't have a democracy in openSUE) those who do the work should decide, not those who rant hardest, chasing everyone away, on the ML :D 20:57:57 jospoortvliet: Yes.. but then all of them have not been included either 20:58:00 AJaeger: yes when it comes to the "project", but "project governance" is a democracy, we do vote for things 20:58:04 robjo: Sure, we were just trying to be transparant that is why we kept in contact with the board 20:58:31 also it could have been a separate Ml like for strategy 20:58:37 manugupt1: but I do announce it and ppl can complain - in private. because in public some ppl just talk because they want to wave their dick around. 20:58:41 transparent to 10 people, whatever 20:58:56 jospoortvliet: +1 20:59:13 jospoortvliet: we shouldn't completely dismiss the -project list like this either 20:59:15 robjo: I wrote in my blog about bikeshedding - I'm practising what I preach. I didn't see you disagree with me there :D 20:59:22 jospoortvliet: there are issues, and we must get it fixed 20:59:31 jospoortvliet: but avoiding the list isn't going to help in any way 20:59:36 yaloki: sure not... But to avoid bikeshedding, well, see what I wrote about how to handle things. I do what I wrote :D 20:59:37 jospoortvliet: didn't read your blog, sorry 21:00:06 jospoortvliet: I know, but I'd rather still have discussions there, and fix the bikeshedding, rather than not having discussions at all 21:00:08 jospoortvliet: Propose it and could have said the discussions on this mailing list like the strategy one, would clear some of the mess 21:00:10 as I said, I would love to see a summary comming out of this ;-) 21:00:12 but we're digressing again 21:00:30 robjo: manugupt1 see my blog: http://blog.jospoortvliet.com/2011/09/bikeshedding-and-cls.html 21:00:32 Ajaeger: I hope you can see i from my point also. I just ge the short end of the stick, not motivating at all 21:00:40 don't get me wrong, I am not happy with the "I have something to say just because" either. But it is part of being in a community 21:00:43 * prusnak has to go, sorry :-/ 21:00:52 ttyl prusnak 21:00:54 jospoortvliet: I have read it :) but did you see my point above 21:00:56 bye prusnak 21:00:58 prusnak: Gn dude 21:01:23 manugupt1: we wanted less ML's, right, see earlier in this discussion :D 21:01:48 LoL 21:01:54 jospoortvliet: Yes but if that clears out some of the mess I would go for it ( and less Mls in terms if traffic I think ) 21:02:39 but lets not go into details 21:02:53 If anyone can summarize it, it would be great for me 21:03:39 well let me do that 21:03:51 the board suggests to wait with a CC until we know greg and greg knows us 21:03:57 that's also what I proposed to him earlier 21:04:07 he seems to say no to that. 21:04:27 no more to discuss, right? 21:04:53 note that we could continue with the CC of course 21:04:56 board likes it or not 21:05:01 yep 21:05:07 jospoortvliet: That would be a bad idea 21:05:21 I think we have enough support 21:05:21 but it's a two-man show and I'd rather not do that so I guess that's of the table too :D 21:05:27 sorry it would be chaos 21:05:56 +1 manugupt1 21:05:59 but 21:06:00 gmzysk: that's where I disagree...I feel we don't, right now.j 21:06:05 on the other hand 21:06:07 Again, if you want to be hard nosed about it, go ahead and stand up the CC, see how the community reacts and what kind of help/support you get 21:06:25 you will net get around a discussion on -project no mater what ;) 21:06:47 robjo said what I wanted to say exactly 21:06:49 Sure, but not giving us any support will only screw the community 21:07:03 jospoortvliet: Right now is really a good answer, give it time I must say l hurrying is no solution 21:07:16 gmzysk: Dont dare threaten the community now, you have been rude enough 21:07:19 I can be too 21:07:29 gmzysk: support is not something you can force to independent people 21:07:35 gmzysk: No, you cannot have it both ways. you either wait as suggested, if that is not an option for you don't expect support 21:07:39 just dont test my patience 21:07:43 Manugupt1 : Calm down I am not threating the community 21:08:19 manugupt1: and you do not know what you are talking about 21:08:29 well 21:08:46 warlordfff: Who said anything about forcing support? 21:08:55 gmzysk: You strike me as the person who thinks they should get commit privileges to a project because you submitted one patch, that's not how things work 21:08:55 look, the CC was supposed to be started by Greg and myself. I think we can agree that right now it wouldn't serve much purpose to start it. So I'm out unless we can agree to wait at least 3-4 months. If at that point things look better, we do it. If not, we wait again :D 21:09:04 gmzysk: manugupt1 reacted at what he saw and in what he saw he is right man, you cannot blame him for that 21:09:21 People can use the CC or not, it is up to them and always will be. This is Free Software!! 21:09:34 gmzysk: The community is not screwed, I have seen people in the project sucessfully in conflict resolution. The difference would be the as needed versus a permanent thingy. 21:09:54 jospoortvliet: +1 to it give it time, wait for it :) 21:10:00 I need just that 21:10:30 I have an opinion. from my perspective gmzysk has proposed a CC, suggesting the project needing such a body to help with conflicts. Then, because of perceptions about how the suggestion was handled, the situation has decended into one which, ironically, would benefit from the a CC. 21:10:45 AJaeger: I am not saying the community is screwed. I am saying neglecting a group to handle these issue would screw the community by not giving it that support 21:10:48 that's just not the way it works in some projects one has to contribute for years before getting commit access to the project repo 21:11:08 robjo: not sure the analogy works here :) 21:11:09 Ilmehtar: But do the people here are fit for the CC and the ones who are proposing it 21:11:18 Ilmehtar: Spot on! 21:11:39 its my opinion that the dispute does highlight a potential need for the CC, but the behaviour exhibited during this dispute suggests we either need more time to get to know greg (and visa versa) 21:11:39 I am not considering jospoortvliet here 21:11:39 manugupt1: jos has studied psychology and gmzysk does conflict resolution professionally 21:11:44 Let's stop the discussion here. With jospoortvliet's statement above, we've reached an end. 21:11:56 manugupt1: I think a valid point is that people are not elected on the board for their skills in conflict management 21:12:21 so my opinion would be strongly in agreement with jos..either wait, or I dont think its going to work with the current situation 21:12:23 yaloki: But gmzysk being rude here deferred him, if it was done at #suse he would have been banned long ago wont he? 21:12:44 hard to believe with that attitude 21:13:30 same here 21:13:34 +1 AJaeger 21:13:48 This hos nothing to do anymore with the project meeting 21:13:48 only a very very few people have the whole picture 21:13:55 Ok, it is time to end the meeting. If you wish to continue please feel free to do so at the end of the meeting. 21:14:01 I make a motion to adjourn 21:14:13 we have a motion to adjourn 21:14:21 Lets close it then 21:14:26 we need a CC to resolve conflicts the CC invent to justify the fact we need to create the CC because there's conflict that raised during the CC's creation 21:14:27 Thanks for the support guys! 21:14:30 Thanks all for attending. 21:14:37 AlanClark: +1 21:14:38 * tigerfoot love absurdity too 21:14:47 #endmeeting