18:16:34 #startmeeting openSUSE Project + Board Meeting 27-July-2011 18:16:34 Meeting started Wed Jul 27 18:16:34 2011 UTC. The chair is suseROCKs. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:16:34 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 18:17:00 AlanClark, note how the topic of the channel changed 18:17:44 hmm forgot the dashes 18:18:38 Who's present from the board? 18:18:44 #chair AlanClark suseROCKs prusnak mrdocs henne 18:18:44 Current chairs: AlanClark henne mrdocs prusnak suseROCKs 18:18:59 Present 18:20:34 so we have 3 board members? (suseROCKS, AlanClark, prusnak) 18:21:18 it would seem so, and the others didn't indicate whether they'd be absent 18:21:30 other gone for Summer Vacations ;-p 18:21:58 Who needs a vacation when we have the love of the openSUSE Project community always nearby? 18:22:00 We don't have quorum. Therefore we can't vote today. We'll have to take trademark usage request off the agenda 18:22:34 Ok let's look at the agenda 18:22:35 +1 though we can discuss if there's something weird in a request (though I don't recall any new requests coming in) 18:23:24 * AlanClark browser just died 18:24:03 Told you to stop using Internet Explorer, AlanClark 18:24:18 firefox sucks those days 18:24:21 is that like not inhailing? 18:24:23 too 18:24:29 lol 18:24:45 on the agenda we have 18:24:49 1 - action items 18:24:56 2 -status reports 18:25:00 Is it Monday morning or Friday afternoon, getting started is dragging like tar. 18:25:10 what part of the week did I miss? 18:25:16 3 - Board meeting at osc 18:25:35 we will skip agenda item #4 since we don't have quorum 18:25:51 5 - where we can improve 18:25:59 6 - Q/A 18:26:12 would anyone like to add/change the agenda? 18:26:24 * suseROCKs seconds the agenda as proposed 18:26:42 ok we're off to the races 18:26:45 #topic Previous Action Items 18:27:48 There are 3 project action items. We've discussed the details in past meetings. Do we have any updates to discuss today? 18:28:15 weren't we going to change the assignee for but 691779? 18:28:29 bug 691779 18:28:31 openSUSE bug 691779 in openSUSE.org (Action Items) "Implement "based on openSUSE" branding packages" [Normal,New] https://bugzilla.novell.com/691779 18:28:59 suseROCKs: to what? 18:29:21 to whom 18:29:41 prusnak, in last meeting I can't remember who, was going to take it since javier is overwhelmed and unable to take care of things and respond to the topic 18:30:06 I think someone (was it henne?) was going to see about re-assigning it to rhlihm 18:30:11 rlihm 18:30:42 Also bug 682098 should be reassigned to cboltz if I recall correctly 18:30:44 openSUSE bug 682098 in openSUSE.org (Action Items) "Decide how we go forward with contributor gifts." [Normal,Reopened] https://bugzilla.novell.com/682098 18:30:44 please add comment to bugzilla, change to needinfo status and add henne as info provider 18:30:58 looking at the log, henne was going to try to find a replacement 18:31:09 suseROCKs: suse-beta is cboltz 18:31:23 oh... that's confusing :-) 18:31:24 so that's ok 18:31:35 thanks for the clarification, prusnak 18:31:35 suseROCKs: the domain part counts ;-) 18:31:43 in openSUSE.org (Action Items) "Decide how we go forward with contributor gifts." [Normal,Reopened] https://bugzilla.novell.com/682098 18:31:44 [12:30] looking at the 18:32:09 okay, so there is no progress on these items i suppose 18:32:17 ok that was wierd; 18:33:05 comments on the gifts last time - was to wait for a proposal from cboltz 18:33:57 I will probably come up with more than one option ;-) 18:34:41 but for today I don't have anything new, so feel free to continue with other topics 18:34:57 cboltz - great! do you have a target date, when you would like to discuss this? 18:35:16 prusnak, if you don't mind, can you look at the bug and tell me if I did it right with changing stuff around? 18:35:52 see the whiteboard - soft ETA is 2011-08-10 (next meeting), hard eta is (obviously) 11.2 RC1 ;-) 18:36:11 what's obvious about 11.2? :-) 18:36:19 suseROCKs: you did great 18:36:53 thanks 18:37:01 well, if we want to give something to the people who contributed to 12.1, then we should decide until the release ;-) 18:37:45 ok can we move on? 18:37:50 thanks cboltz 18:38:07 let's move to the board AI's 18:38:32 There are 2. 18:38:55 The one assigned to me is still on hold 18:39:06 prusnak - anything to discuss on the one assigned to you? 18:39:16 no 18:39:44 prusnak, how about a bof on bug reporting issues at the conference? :-) 18:40:16 hm, we might consider that 18:40:22 but i think that's not a big issue 18:40:38 I meant that in jest :-) 18:40:50 shall we move to the next topic 18:40:55 yes please 18:40:59 * cboltz could probably fill a whole day with funny[tm] stories and discussions with the bugzilla team 18:41:03 #topic Status Reports 18:41:44 Regarding Conference...I'll do sub-topic - Program Committee 18:41:54 Are there any teams or individuals who would like to provide a status report? 18:42:31 #info openSUSE Conference Program Committee has closed its deadline for CFP submissions, though a few are still trickling in. We have about 120 proposals already and very awesome. We have our work cut out for us to complete all by Aug 5th at latest to announce our program 18:42:59 Anybody else here want to talk about general Conference planning status? 18:43:36 If not, (and I don't have much to say on that line) I'll go on to Marketing Team status 18:44:07 going once... going twice.... 18:44:09 We have a great set of CFP submissions. We are going to have some very good content at the conference 18:44:33 AlanClark, yes indeed. Our committee definitely has its work cut out for it 18:44:45 Let's go to Marketing team status 18:45:20 okey doke.... 18:45:59 #info Marketing Team will have a joint hackfest with the Artwork team on September 15-16 in Nuremberg at the SUSE Offices to complete some tasks for openSUSE 12.1 Release 18:46:13 a dream come true 18:46:21 sit on AJ's office 18:46:25 ;-) 18:46:28 :-) 18:47:38 #info A formal announcement will be sent to the Marketing and Ambassador teams later today announcing the creation of a new program to sponsor Ambassador Travel costs. The Ambassador team will self-determine and plan quarterly budgets for travel to important destinations to promote openSUSE throughout the year 18:48:20 Each quarterly proposal is, of course, subject to Jos Poortvliet's final approval in each case. 18:48:40 That's about it from the Marketing side for now 18:49:17 AlanClark, back to you... 18:49:32 suseROCKS - as part of the hackfest, will that include, discussing release parties, etc? 18:49:51 (aka getting people to plan release parties) 18:49:57 we should start this sooner 18:50:10 AlanClark, That is topic that ambassador team representatives at the hackfest can/should tackle. Yes 18:50:14 the planning for the party 18:50:56 warlordfff, just to be clear. The hackfest is not the start of marketing planning. We should be doing any and all planning ASAP wherever possible. :-) 18:51:09 of course 18:51:17 And I'm going to be calling a meeting for next Tuesday to begin promotion planning discussions 18:51:32 we should start thinking a second ambassador collaboration day too 18:51:40 That is, in fact, next on my to-email list today :-) 18:52:03 +1 18:52:18 warlordfff, an online event? Like back in Dec? Good idea. Bring that up at the meeting on Tuesday 18:52:46 warlordfff: will do that on G+ :D 18:53:04 yeap 18:53:06 oh no! More G+ spam from warlordfff? :-) 18:53:13 ok, any other team status to report? 18:53:38 tigerfoot, you've been closely involved with factory. Anything useful to report here? 18:54:59 it's going so well that tigerfoot is speechless 18:55:32 heh 18:55:42 prusnak, how about boosters? 18:56:06 boosters post regular updates on their mailinglist 18:56:24 we were working on OBS download page recently 18:56:51 so upstream projects can include this page in iframe in their upstream project page 18:57:13 see e.g. http://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=openSUSE:Tools&package=osc 18:57:17 oh that is very cool. Should make it *much* easier for us to promote OBS 18:57:44 next step is to try to persuade some upstream foss projects to actually use obs and this page 18:59:07 prusnak - do we have any of the persuasive arguments on why/how they would do it written down? 18:59:18 not yet 18:59:35 we'll write a news story once with documentation we declare it as finished 18:59:47 kde 4.7 will be there tomorrow 18:59:48 we'll write a news story with documentation once we declare it as finished 18:59:59 another next step: contact the big foss hosting providers (sourceforge etc) - it should be possible to place the link on the download page 19:00:05 Marketing team will be *very* interested in collaborating with you on that as the team has highly interested in promoting OBS as part of their efforts 19:00:16 and yes, some boosters are organizing kde 4.7 release party in nbg office right now 19:00:43 cb400f, I believe at one point we did try to reach out to sourceforge, but no interest at that time. Wouldn't hurt to re-double that effort again though 19:01:09 * cboltz thinks suseROCKs shouldn't trust tab completion too much 19:01:40 thanks prusnak - good stuff! 19:01:46 any other team status? 19:01:55 Robert Schweikert - want to report on cloud? 19:01:56 * suseROCKs trusts cboltz to inform him that his tab completion is #fail 19:02:28 * AlanClark not sure Robert is here 19:03:19 I think we can move on from this topic now 19:03:43 #topic Board meeting at osc 19:04:08 Perhaps we should simply move this to the mailing list 19:04:23 and discuss it there 19:04:25 Agreed. not enough people here to have a reasonable discusssion 19:04:42 I will take the AI to start a mail thread 19:04:47 agreed, but for the record i'm ok with having it prior the conference 19:04:57 same here 19:05:37 +1; we just need to work out some details soon so that everyone can book travel appropriately 19:06:18 #topic Where do we need to improve? 19:06:50 For once, i actually don't have anything to complain about here :-) 19:07:13 I don't see any new entries in openFATE 19:08:23 not even yaloki has any improvement suggestions? 19:08:28 suseROCKS, Guess we've reached perfection 19:09:18 we did 19:09:36 ;-) 19:09:47 ok, shall we move to the next topic? 19:10:10 you guys are still stuck with me, so we haven't reached perfection yet. 19:10:46 #topic Q/A 19:11:16 There are no questions posted to the wiki. Do we have any questions from the meeting participants? 19:11:48 c'mon warlordfff You must have a million questions! 19:12:04 I do 19:12:23 but I have a Greek ambassadors meeting to now so... 19:13:35 raincheck 19:14:18 ok since we're so quiet today... going once 19:14:26 twice 19:14:39 thrice 19:14:54 that concludes the agenda. 19:14:59 Any other topics to discuss today? 19:15:15 None here 19:15:17 any news wrt foundation? 19:15:18 for QA 19:15:39 I've just a question about the status about member approvement process, 19:15:50 prusnak, no new news wrt foundation yet 19:15:55 we didn't have report recently, did we ? 19:16:12 tigerfoot, report from? 19:16:16 tigerfoot: we (boosters) reworked interface so it is much easier now 19:16:31 and membership approval started to work on it again 19:16:39 membership approval team 19:16:59 so they're happy with the process and things are expediting? 19:17:08 prusnak: ok .. 19:17:18 good to heard 19:17:23 kudos to the membership approval team - I can see that they are working through the approvals!!!! 19:17:23 if someone is unhappy we don't know it 19:17:49 good answer, prusnak :-) 19:18:17 prusnak: it's quite normal, sometimes people think that if they make too much noise, they will be considered as (...place your word here ...) :D 19:18:51 but now if the process is ok again, then I will ask them to make noise :-) 19:19:45 lo gang 19:19:54 hello 19:19:55 Hey mrdocs 19:20:04 sorry i was not here earlier.. internet turbulence here 19:20:07 We're at the Q/A topic in the agenda 19:20:11 ok 19:20:16 anything needing votes ? 19:20:26 Actually yes 19:20:37 with 4 we can go back to agenda item #3 19:20:57 Any other Q/A questions? 19:21:24 er agenda item #4 19:21:47 #topic permission@ requests 19:22:20 We have one request for trademark usage from media-moritz 19:22:20 * suseROCKs wrings mrdocs I thought I was able to walk away :-) 19:22:53 AlanClark, what's the subject line, if you don't mind? 19:23:32 the latest email subject line: "Re: Fwd: OpenSUSE logo in my online-shop" 19:23:40 ahh that one 19:23:48 "Requests for use of the trademarks have been received through permission@. The board has needs to vote on the following: " 19:25:11 Looking at his proposed website, it looks to me like he is simply distributing openSUSE. 19:25:34 looks ok to me as well 19:26:11 ok from me as well 19:26:13 In which case I don't think that the board needs to give approval - His use case is already covered and granted in the trademark guidelines 19:26:33 I can't fairly comment on the usage in the site itself as it is in German, but if it is simply a re-distribution, its okay by me. 19:26:37 Is he charging a fee? 19:26:50 yes 19:27:14 what kind of fee? 19:27:15 er - at least the site is setup to where he can charge a fee 19:27:52 if its a "handling fee" I won't object. If its a "selling fee" I'm not sure where we stand on that. 19:30:22 The site has a shopping cart - he doesn't state how much of a fee or if it's for shipping/handling 19:31:30 are we concerned about that? If not, I'll vote yes. 19:31:50 prusnak - translate this "Dieses Angebot beinhaltet keinen kommerziellen Support." 19:32:02 if I'm not mistaken, as long as you keep it intact, its not a violation to sell. Am I wrong? prusnak mrdocs thoughts? 19:32:15 * prusnak copies that into google translate 19:32:27 LOL 19:32:29 AlanClark: it means "This offer does not contain commercial support" 19:32:34 This offer does not include commercial support. 19:32:46 lol 19:33:00 prusnak - is the turing machine! 19:33:12 he takes 1 eur as a compensation for burning and media price 19:33:19 i assume 19:33:45 pffth if that's the case, there's hardly anything to question here. I say +1 19:34:18 its not like we're selling warlordfff,, for which we would demand a lot more money. 19:34:36 * warlordfff not for sale 19:34:44 how about rent? 19:34:46 * warlordfff present to humanity 19:34:47 The 1 eur may just be a placeholder while he develops the site. 19:35:02 So we can't assume what his price will be 19:35:26 I will clarify with him that the fees are for burning and media. 19:35:34 alright, let's clear up the general question. Do we have issues/violations if someone *sells* openSUSE? 19:36:01 if the question is yes, then we need to look further into this. If the answer is no, then nothing to discuss I guess. 19:37:31 Where he is referring to material that makes it clear that openSUSE is an open source project, I don't have a problem with it. From that it should be obvious that they could get it from the openSUSE project. 19:37:53 That should keep his prices to a media price level 19:38:21 ok then let's just +1 it and move on. 19:38:45 prusnak, mrdocs concerns? vote? State now so we can close the meeting and have a life 19:38:58 i already said i'm ok with that 19:39:15 ok mrdocs for the quorum-requiring vote... 19:39:21 * AlanClark is ok 19:39:39 suseROCKS, mrdocs also already voted 19:39:44 oh ok 19:39:48 then we're ready to go and close 19:40:07 With that, we are at the end of our agenda. 19:40:08 what????? 19:40:30 :D 19:40:33 jk 19:40:41 ahh yaloki yaloki yaloki This is so unlike you :-D 19:41:10 Any last items from the group? else we are closing the meeting 19:41:26 Close Close Close! :-D 19:41:57 * yaloki goes on to pay 200€ for opensu.se 19:42:07 thanks everyone for participating 19:42:11 #endmeeting